Saturday, June 16, 2007

Test three.. .a nice compound squeeze

DealerN
Vul-
Lead4
 
QT642
AK3
T72
T8
J95
T964
43
J643
3
Q8752
J986
Q72
AK87
J
AKQ5
AK95


WestNorthEastSouth
 pp2
p2p3
p3p4
p4p4NT
p5p5NT
p6p7NT
ppp


This will be the first new hand in chapter 4 of the identifying squeeze blogger book, assuming I can get the template thing working as I know it should. This is a typical compound squeeze where save 7 spades was bypassed to play in 7NT.

Friday, June 15, 2007

test two

This is a test of the ability to publish a hand with the encoded template information. It seems to work. althought the diamond symbol is missing.

 
654
T98765
AKQJ
T987
AKQ
T32
732
32
J
654
AKQJT98
AKQJ
654
987
654

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

One From Kenrexford

BBO user Kenrexford posted an interesting hand on the BridgeBase Forum page a few days back. It was..
DealerS
VulAll
Lead
 
A432
7
Q5432
AK9
AKJ65432
A76
102



In the problem, as stated, you won the spade ACE at trick one, and discarded a diamond. That is ok, although you might choose to ruff the first lead and save the spade ACE, it will not be important for the rest of the discussion.

You have 8 heart tricks -- assuming you can find the queen (in the problem, you drop Qx offside), 1D, 1S, and 2C. That comes to 12 tricks. You can always play WEST to have QJx(x) of clubs (double finessee) which is just less than 25% (somewhere around 24%).

What squeeze chances are there? West could have 6S and 6C (ruff spade at trick two) and be squeezed, but we assume bidding eliminates that possibility. Someone could have 6D and the QJ of clubs, again a very long shot.

So as you look for squeeze chances, it seems that BLUE will be violated because of lack of a double threat. In fact, it is not clear any single threat is guarded by only one opponent (the long diamond in dummy can not be a used to isolate a threat against opponent with three diamonds because you have to lose a trick to turn it into a threat).

What squeeze chances are there? Well both black threats HAVE TO BE in north *you have no spades and the thrird club is in dummy), so for any three suit squeeze to work, the diamond threat will have to be south's remaining "x" after one is thrown on the spade ACE.

This begins to look like a hexagonal squeeze, where both opponents stop all three suits. But they have to give something up when you run hearts. You can imagine an ending where south retains 2H, 2D, and 2C, and dummy 2S, 1D, 3C. In this six card ending, no opponent can keep 3C and 2 cards in both additional side suits. So you will have isolated a threat against one opponent, as typically found in a compound squeeze.

Can a compound squeeze work here? The requirements for a compound squeeze is that whenever the opponent abandon's a suit, the remaining one of the remaining suits can serve as a "both" threat (guarded by both opponents). The problem here is that such a "both" suit requires an entry in its own suit. Here, if they make spades the "both suit", there is no double squeeze, because there is no entry in the spade suit.

When the both threat suit lacks an entry, a possible remedy is a guard squeeze. Can this hexagonal squeeze resolve to a compound guard squeeze? One requirement for guard squeeze is that one threat be partially finessable (unblock clubs and that suit is). Another is the side suit have a winner (diamond Ace) makes that true. However, if EAST keeps spades and clubs (behind dummy), west can keep diamonds and there is not squeeze of any type.

So against perfect defense (EAST knows to keep quards against threats in front of him), the squeeze must fail. Suggesting a straightforward club double finessee. But can there be any reason to forgo the finessee? Well if EAST has five diamonds, the quard squeeze has to work, but 5-1 diamond split with EAST having four plus is less likely than QJ of clubs onside (4-1, 5-0 splits are 13.2 + 1.9 or 15.1%).

However, you need not be in a hurry to take the double finesse in clubs. You can apply the pressure by running a bunch of hearts. On the hand in question, EAST did have five diamonds. Which becomes obvious by the discards. Now a double quard squeeze shows up when the ending becomes something like:
DealerS
VulAll
Lead
 
xx
x
AK9
Kxx
Qxx
QJ
KQ
Jx\
xx
Ax
Tx


Here you lead the club Ten to the ACE, ruff a spade, and play out the last trump. East will have to keep both diamonds and the club jack, so he discards his last spade. West, can comfortably discard his next to last spade. Now you cash the diamond ACE, and WEST is squeezed in the black suits. A spade and you throw a club from dummy, a club and dummy discards the spade.

Note, if you can not READ the diamond position, the odds favor the double finessee. Once you cound down WEST with loads of clubs and spades, and EAST shows up with the diamonds, the odds switch to the double guard squeeze. EW should try to make it a little more difficult, but they really have very little room.. EAST has to keep at least two clubs. If east is able to keep three clubs and had 4+ spades, nothing will work here, but his five card diamond holding forces him to give something up.

Monday, June 11, 2007

First try at formating Squeeze hand



This hand is from French BBO Gold Star "Patapon" and was posted without solution on the BBO Forum (some time she will come back and tell us how it should be played). The problem is to figure out the best line to make a contract of 6S by SOUTH on the HK opening lead.

WE can count quickly 5S, 1H, 2D, 3C for 11 tricks. If clubs split 3-3 we have 12. Chances of 3-3 club split are not so good (roughly 36%). Can we do better. Our mind turns to our squeeze lessons (see the identifying squeeze blog). One possibility that might occur to you is if North has KQJ of hearts and four clubs, but we can see EVEN if that is the case, all the guards are behind the threats (that is no threat in the "upper" hand and "U" is defective).

Next squeeze chance is north has KQJ of hearts and five or more diamonds. Now the dummy's small diamond and the heart TEN would be threats against him. That is a long shot, but you can play for that or 3-3 clubs, which increases your chance of making over the 3-3 clubs alone.

There is some reason to hope that WEST has KQJ of hearts. The next possible threat card is your small club. Only one opponent can hold four clubs. If it is WEST, that is of little use to you, unless he has five diamonds to go along with his known clubs. But if EAST has four+ clubs, now you have something almost. If WEST has KQJ of hearts too, then you have a proven double squeeze. Duck the heart, and they crumble.

But what if EAST has the heart JACK, and WEST switches to a spade at trick two (a heart helps you isolate a threat). Now, you worry that EAST guards clubs, and both guard the red suits. This is the defective case for the double squeeze, but fortunately, a double guard squeeze can help you out of this pickle. You play either for 3-3 clubs, or south having long ones.

Play four rounds of spades, pitching a diamond, then win three rounds of clubs, ending in dummy. If clubs are 3-3 claim. If south has 4+ clubs, cash the last spade in an ending something like this...



Note, EAST has already been squeezed out of his diamond stopper (or his heart stopper). This happened on the next to last free suit winner, as he was squeezed in three suits. You can cash the two top diamonds, ending in north, and play the last trump now. East will have to keep the club, so he can keep only 1H. Once he throws a heart, South lets go the Cx. Now it is West turn, he has to keep the DJ or dummys diamond is good, so he comes down to one heart. South now wins the H-A H-T on the last two tricks.

Next time, a compound guard squeeze.

How did this display of hands work?

Test Post




By George, I may have got it....



North with a comfortable ZAR count, opens 1H, and WEST feels compelled to double with three trump tricks, but that is all he will get.

Sunday, June 10, 2007

testing Firmit's template

BBO user Firmit has offered up a template for bridgehands for Blogs. Right now, only EW hands, this is an attempt to see if it works for me.